A Small Claims Court for Pennsylvania

نویسنده

  • GEORGE SCOTT
چکیده

Two of the principal criticisms directed against the present arrangement of our courts are that the costs are too high in controversies involving small sums of money and that the procedure in such cases is too complicated. In many states an effort has been made to remedy these defects by the establishment of special courts, of limited jurisdiction, to hear certain cases of small claims only. To date, eighteen states have adopted legislation setting up small claims machinery of one type or another.1 In some states in which such tribunals have been set up the court consists of nothing more than a division of an existing court, with the right to file pleadings more informally than is otherwise permitted and a diminution of costs.2 In one state an independent court has been set up.3 In Pennsylvania, while the machinery of the law is no more cumbersome than that of many other states, there exists among lawyers, nevertheless, much sentiment in favor of simplifying the procedure and decreasing the costs in certain types of small cases. This sentiment is particularly to be

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

بررسی و آسیب شناسی ساختار و صلاحیت های مراجع اختصاصی اداری در حقوق اداری ایران

The issue of this study is the structure and competence of administrative specific tribunal with specific pathological approach with respect to their claims referred to the Administrative Justice Court. The authors of this research contemplate that in addition to  the mechanisms in Articles 16 and 63 of the Organization and Procedures of the Administrative Justice Court, to reduce the amou...

متن کامل

Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE An analysis of paid malpractice claims judged in court compared with those settled out of court may help explain perceptions of malpractice risk. DESIGN A retrospective analysis and cross-sectional comparison of malpractice claims. Evaluated trends in the number and proportion of paid claims, and mean payment amount by resolution type; identified patient, physician and claim charact...

متن کامل

New Duty to Warn in Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a case of first impression, recently addressed the duty of Pennsylvania mental health professionals to a non-patient third party.' Although the Court upheld the dismissal of the lawsuit on the pleadings prior to trial. the Court created a "duty to warn" specific, endangered third parties. The holding leaves much to be desired for mental health professionals tr...

متن کامل

I WOLF Sheep ’ s Clothing : A in Wolf v . Ashcroft and the Constitutionality of Using the MPAA Ratings to Censor Films in Prison

n 2001, prisoners in Pennsylvania challenged a prison policy prohibiting them from watching films rated R, X, or NC-17. The prison policy was designed to implement the Zimmer Amendment,2 which denies funding to any prison that shows R, X, or NC-17 films.3 After the District Court denied the prisoners’ claims in a cursory opinion, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit remanded for a more fa...

متن کامل

Simplified Civil Procedure in Japan

Japanese civil procedure covers four types of simplified procedures: ordinary proceedings in summary courts; actions on bills, notes, and checks; actions on small claims; and payment orders. Actions on small claims were newly introduced as civil procedure in 1996 to promote public access to justice. Summary courts have jurisdiction over these actions. The use of actions on small claims once inc...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017